libs/RF24
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added an indication of which pipe a message came from. Fixed a bug where pipes 2+ were not

Browse Source 
getting enabled.
This commit is contained in:
maniacbug
2011-04-01 22:55:33 -07:00
parent 37d8e8b17d
commit c8ed556aba
2 changed files with 45 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

43
RF24.cpp
View File

@@ -232,6 +232,14 @@ void RF24::printDetails(void)
printf("%02x",*bufptr);
printf("\n\r");
status = read_register(RX_ADDR_P2,buffer,1);
printf("RX_ADDR_P2 = 0x%02x",*buffer);
printf("\n\r");
status = read_register(RX_ADDR_P3,buffer,1);
printf("RX_ADDR_P3 = 0x%02x",*buffer);
printf("\n\r");
status = read_register(TX_ADDR,buffer,5);
printf("TX_ADDR = 0x",buffer);
bufptr = buffer + 5;
@@ -350,10 +358,16 @@ boolean RF24::write( const void* buf, uint8_t len )
return result;
}
/******************************************************************/
boolean RF24::available(void)
{
return available(NULL);
}
/******************************************************************/
boolean RF24::available(uint8_t* pipe_num)
{
uint8_t status = get_status();
boolean result = ( status & _BV(RX_DR) );
@@ -362,7 +376,15 @@ boolean RF24::available(void)
{
IF_SERIAL_DEBUG(print_status(status));
// If the caller wants the pipe number, include that
if ( pipe_num )
*pipe_num = ( status >> RX_P_NO ) & B111;
// Clear the status bit
// ??? Should this REALLY be cleared now? Or wait until we
// actually READ the payload?
write_register(STATUS,_BV(RX_DR) );
}
@@ -408,18 +430,25 @@ void RF24::openReadingPipe(uint8_t child, uint64_t value)
const uint8_t child_payload_size[] = {
RX_PW_P1, RX_PW_P2, RX_PW_P3, RX_PW_P4, RX_PW_P5 };
const uint8_t child_pipe_enable[] = {
ENAA_P1, ENAA_P2, ENAA_P3, ENAA_P4, ENAA_P5 };
ERX_P1, ERX_P2, ERX_P3, ERX_P4, ERX_P5 };
if (--child < 5)
{
write_register(child_pipe[child], reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(&value), 5);
// For pipes 2-5, only write the LSB
if ( !child )
write_register(child_pipe[child], reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(&value), 5);
else
write_register(child_pipe[child], reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(&value), 1);
write_register(child_payload_size[child],payload_size);
// Note this is kind of an inefficient way to set up these enable bits, bit I thought it made
// the calling code more simple
uint8_t en_aa;
read_register(EN_AA,&en_aa,1);
en_aa |= _BV(child_pipe_enable[child]);
write_register(EN_AA,en_aa);
uint8_t en_rx;
read_register(EN_RXADDR,&en_rx,1);
en_rx |= _BV(child_pipe_enable[child]);
write_register(EN_RXADDR,en_rx);
}
}
// vim:ai sts=2 sw=2 ft=cpp